1) Insights – My insights from this course primarily involve research design. Now, I know more about variables, mixed-method approaches, validity, and ethics. The course readings helped me understand what it takes to design investigations which yield transparent, self-reflexive, and equitable outcomes to support social change.
2) Research Ideas – My ides of research have changed primarily in the area of quantitative and qualitative approaches. I have a science background, so I always considered research to be quantitative. Now, I understand the importance of triangulation and adding qualitative aspects to one’s research. Triangulation adds validity and richer outcomes. Adding qualitative approaches to research design also allows participant involvement and a more even distribution of power.
3) Lessons – I learned the importance of bringing my ontological and epistemological views to the foreground of my research design. How I approach a research study will become evident in my theoretical framework, so I should be transparent from the start regarding my views.
4) Challenges – My greatest challenge is actually in the data collection plan. I am not sure if OSS data can be pulled from the district database by teacher. I need to see the OSS impact of the treatment group versus the control group of teachers; therefore, OSS data must be pulled by teacher. I also think it is unlikely the district will allow me to add subcategories to “other” in their database. I am afraid this category will be overused which will hinder my efforts to analyze OSS by specific violation. I may have to give teachers a paper form to overcome this problem.
5) Perceptions – My perception of an early childhood professional was one who had deep expertise in the developmental stages of childhood. I had not considered that EC professionals would be concerned with global issues that plague children all over the world, but it makes perfect sense. I also had not considered the importance of research design to the EC professional.